Case Summary
Jacob is the plaintiff who filed a suit against David Chacko and others regarding a dispute over a pond situated in plaint A schedule property. The suit seeks to permanently restrain the defendants from entering the property and using the pond.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Amendment of the plaint permitted within 7 days
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The application to amend the plaint was allowed as it was deemed necessary for the just disposal of the case. No order as to costs was made.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The amendment sought by the petitioner was necessary for the just disposal of the case.
The amendment sought by the petitioner was necessary for the just disposal of the case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The amendment is necessary for the just and proper decision in the suit.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the application is allowed and the petitioner is directed to carry out the amendments within 7 days.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jacob
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- David Chacko
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Samuel Chacko
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Baby Mathew
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- T.C.Baby
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.T.Geevarghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jayasankar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Gopalakrishnan Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- C.P.Johny
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anjusha Ajayan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Gopika Gokul
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jayakumar E.N.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petitioner is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain the defendants from entering into plaint A schedule property and pumping water from the pond situated in that property.
Evidence:
The suit is filed for permanently restraining the defendants from entering into plaint A schedule property and pumping water from the pond situated in the plaint A schedule property.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The application for amendment of the plaint to incorporate necessary details is allowed.
Evidence:
It is seen that the amendment which is sought by the petitioner is necessary for the just disposal of the case.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jacob vs David Chacko et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Jacob vs David Chacko et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction