Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP 257/2025

Case between Ismayil Puthukkatt Kuniyil vs Aboobacker et al regarding execution petition.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-12-17
Duration
Case Code No.
257
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ismayil Puthukkatt Kuniyil filed the execution petition against Aboobacker and Muneera regarding the enforcement of a decree. The respondents were not represented in court during the proceedings.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition was heard in the absence of the decree holder who did not appear in court. The property was delivered, and full satisfaction was recorded.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was heard in the absence of the decree holder who did not appear in court. The property was delivered, and full satisfaction was recorded.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The decree holder was not present, leading to the delivery of property and recording full satisfaction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The decree holder was not present, leading to the delivery of property and recording full satisfaction.
Supporting Evidence
Decree Holder absent. No representation. Property delivered. Full satisfaction recorded.

Judgment Evidence:

This petition coming on this day for hearing before me in the presence of Smt. Jishamol. M. P, Advocate for Petitioner and Respondent not entered in appearance and this court passed the following:- ORDER This petition filed under Order XXI Rule 35 of the code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Decree Holder absent. No representation. Property delivered. Full satisfaction recorded. EP closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ismayil Puthukkatt Kuniyil
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aboobacker
Party Age
53
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammad. M
Party Age
23
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muneera
Party Age
38
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Salam
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Jishamol. M. P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Property delivered and full satisfaction recorded
Evidence:
Property delivered. Full satisfaction recorded. EP closed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

EP 94/2024
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Execution Petition Unknown
Case between IRINGANNOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. vs NISAR et al regarding execution petition.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between KAVILUMPARA RURAL EMPLOYEES & WORKERS WELFARE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. et al vs SUNIL. K et al regarding EP proceedings.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Asya vs Sameera regarding execution proceedings.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between T K Abdul Salam vs Kunhammad regarding execution petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Execution Petition Unknown