Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 895/2016

Case between Isha vs K.B.Pradeepan regarding dismissal for default

Court
THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-02-16
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Isha as the plaintiff and K.B.Pradeepan as the defendant. The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and their counsel.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and their legal representation. The court had given several opportunities for the plaintiff to appear.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's continuous absence led to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Isha (47 years years) Thittayil house, Perikkadu, chambakkara, Eroor (P.O), Ernakulam – 682 306

Defendants

K.B.Pradeepan (45 years years) Kolothara veedu, Perikkadu, Chambakkar, Eroor (P.O), Ernakulam – 682 306

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to absence of plaintiff and their counsel.
Evidence:
Hence, Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases