Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 895/2016

Case between Isha vs K.B.Pradeepan regarding dismissal for default

Court
THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-02-16
Duration
Case Closed
Tue, 02/06/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Isha as the plaintiff and K.B.Pradeepan as the defendant. The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and their counsel.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and their legal representation. The court had given several opportunities for the plaintiff to appear.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and their legal representation. The court had given several opportunities for the plaintiff to appear.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's continuous absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's continuous absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Inspite of several opportunities the plaintiff and plaintiff counsel not present.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Isha
Party Age
47
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.B.Pradeepan
Party Age
45
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Manju G.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Saji P Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Mini G
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sabitha K.A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Seena A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to absence of plaintiff and their counsel.
Evidence:
Hence, Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Isha vs K.B.Pradeepan regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Isha vs K.B.Pradeepan regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 02/06/2024 - 12:00
From
Thu, 02/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 02/29/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won