Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1155/2020

Case between Isac vs N. Jayakrishnan et al regarding suit not pressed.

Court
II Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-03-27
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Isac is the plaintiff against N. Jayakrishnan and others. The suit was not pressed by the plaintiff's counsel.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit filed by the plaintiff was dismissed as not pressed on the day of the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by the plaintiff was dismissed as not pressed on the day of the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

In light of memo filed, suit dismissed as not pressed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Isac
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
N. Jayakrishnan
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Annapoorni Jayakrishnan
Party Age
53
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Stella Paul
Party Age
57
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Manu Roy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Bindu.K.N.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A. Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rajagopalan.A.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.N. Manmadan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sandhya.C.Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sojo.J. Kallidukil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
R. Rajesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Peter Tharakan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Francis Peter Tharakan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaintiff stated that suit is not pressed.
Evidence:
In light of memo filed, suit dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Isac vs N. Jayakrishnan et al regarding suit not pressed.
Case Code Year
Case between Isac vs N. Jayakrishnan et al regarding suit not pressed.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won