Case Summary
Innomed Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. filed a suit against P.V. Preetha for recovery of Rs. 7,17,600 due for a Fuji computed radiography system and related products. The plaintiff claims the defendant failed to make payment despite assurances.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs. 7,17,600 with interest @ 12% per annum and costs of the proceedings.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff successfully established that the defendant failed to make payment for the purchased products.
The plaintiff successfully established that the defendant failed to make payment for the purchased products.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed on the following terms. Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs. 7,17,600 with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of suit till decree and thereafter @ 6% per annum till realization.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Innomed Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (Age not specified years)
Gitanjali, Press Club Colony, Anchumana Road, Edappally.P.O., Ernakulam, Pin – 682 024
Defendants
P.V. Preetha (48 years)
Near Govt Hospital, Kuthuparamba, Kannur District, Pin – 670 643
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs. 7,17,600 with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of suit till decree.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed on the following terms. Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs. 7,17,600 (Rupees Seven Lakhs seventeen Thousand six hundred only) with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of suit till decree and thereafter @ 6% per annum till realization.
Relief Type:
Cost
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the proceedings from the defendant.
Evidence:
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case plaintiff is entitled for the costs of the proceeding from defendant.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Quotation
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
It was issued by Fuji Film India Pvt. Ltd. to the defendant regarding the price of the Fuji computed radiography system.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Purchase Order
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
It was placed by the defendant for the Fuji computed radiography system.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Customer application form
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
It was submitted by the defendant to the plaintiff for the purchase of the CR system.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Invoices
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
These are copies of invoices issued to the defendant for the sale of the Fuji computed radiography system and X-ray films.
Reference:
Exts.A4 to Exts.A7
Document Type:
Letter
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
It is a letter issued by the plaintiff to the defendant requesting payment.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type:
Lawyers notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
It is a lawyers notice issued to the defendant regarding the outstanding dues.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type:
A/d Card
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
It confirms the receipt of the aforementioned lawyers notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type:
Complaint
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
These are copies of the complaint filed before the SHO, Palarivattom.
Reference:
Ext.A11 to Ext.A13
Document Type:
Oral Evidence
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
This includes the oral evidence of PW1, which was presented in the court.
Reference: