Case Summary
Petitioner Illikkal Kumaran filed a restoration petition against respondent Muttikkal Hydrose Haji.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Allowed the restoration petition
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed on costs of Rs.2500 to the petitioner.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petition was allowed on the basis of payment of costs by the petitioner.
The petition was allowed on the basis of payment of costs by the petitioner.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petition was allowed on the basis of payment of costs by the petitioner.
The petition was allowed on the basis of payment of costs by the petitioner.
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
Allowed the petition on costs of Rs.2500. IA. Allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Illikkal Kumaran
- Party Age
- 1
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muttikkal Hydrose Haji
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The restoration petition was allowed on costs of Rs.2500
Evidence:
Allowed the petition on costs of Rs.2500. IA. Allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PTN.
Case Code Year
2017