Case Summary
The court allowed the RCP in terms of the mediation agreement signed by the parties, which settled the matter between the petitioner and the respondent.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Settlement through memorandum of agreement
Case Type
Civil Suit - Mediation Settlement
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the memorandum of agreement signed by the parties as the matter was settled through mediation.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Not mentioned
Judgment Evidence:
The RCP is allowed in terms of the memorandum of agreement executed by parties.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ilanattil Ayishumma-P1
- Party Age
- 72
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Regional Manager
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.K.Moosakutty
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate for the Respondent
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Settlement through memorandum of agreement
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Court allowed the RCP in terms of the memorandum of agreement executed by parties.
Evidence:
The RCP is allowed in terms of the memorandum of agreement executed by parties.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Mediation Settlement
Category
Settlement and Mediation
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
R.C.P
Case Code Year
2014
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement