Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
E.P No. 142/2024

Case between I.D.B.I Bank Ltd. vs M/s Mad Max Garments regarding enforcement of decree.

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2026-01-05
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

I.D.B.I Bank Ltd. is the decree holder represented by Manoj Kumar K. M/s Mad Max Garments is the judgment debtor represented by Suneesh Sukumar. The petition pertains to the enforcement of a decree.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the execution petition due to the decree holder's absence and failure to take further steps despite multiple chances.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the execution petition due to the decree holder's absence and failure to take further steps despite multiple chances.
Key Reasoning:
The decree holder was not present for the hearing and did not take further steps.
Why Defendant Won:
The decree holder was not present for the hearing and did not take further steps.
Supporting Evidence
Decree Holder not present or ready for enquiry despite numerous chances and posting as last chance no further steps.

Judgment Evidence:

The court on the same day, passed the following: EP of the year 2024. Not inclined to grant further time. Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
I.D.B.I Bank Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Mad Max Garments
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suneesh Sukumar
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jaykar k.s.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ramya Jayakar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Padmapriya P.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Abhilash N.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The execution petition was dismissed due to the decree holder's absence.
Evidence:
Decree Holder not present or ready for enquiry despite numerous chances and posting as last chance no further steps. EP of the year 2024. Not inclined to grant further time. Dismissed

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between I.D.B.I Bank Ltd. vs M/s Mad Max Garments regarding enforcement of decree.
Case Code Year
Case between I.D.B.I Bank Ltd. vs M/s Mad Max Garments regarding enforcement of decree.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 01/01/2026 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/21/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s Canara Bank vs Nimrodh Communications regarding E.P. No. 292/2025
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Sri. K. Gopinathan vs HDFC Bank Ltd regarding execution of decree.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Unknown
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Mini V B regarding Execution Petition
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Anilkumar. P. K regarding satisfaction of decree.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between The Shamughapuram Co-operative Bank Limited vs Sumathy Vijayan regarding execution petition
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won