Case Summary
The decree holder is IDBI Bank Ltd represented by Sri.P.H. Hashim. The judgment debtors include several individuals who were named in the petition. The case involves execution proceedings that were dismissed for default due to the absence of the decree holder.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was dismissed for default due to the absence of the decree holder and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the decree holder was absent and took no fresh steps.
The court found that the decree holder was absent and took no fresh steps.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Decree holder absent and no representation.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence EP dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- IDBI Bank Ltd
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Haritha
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sasikala
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Prassanna
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mini
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sreekala
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- H.Raju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between IDBI Bank Ltd et al vs Haritha et al regarding EP dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between IDBI Bank Ltd et al vs Haritha et al regarding EP dismissal for default.