Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1434/2022

Case between Hina Raza vs Perunelly Manoj regarding dismissal for default.

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Judge
Smt. Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-03-12
Duration
approximately-1 year 9 months
Case Code No.
1434
Case Closed
Wed, 03/12/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Hina Raza is the plaintiff who filed the suit against Perunelly Manoj, the defendant. The court dismissed the suit for default due to lack of fresh steps taken by the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiff failed to take fresh steps despite being directed to do so.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiff failed to take fresh steps despite being directed to do so.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not take necessary steps as directed by the court.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not take necessary steps as directed by the court.
Supporting Evidence
No fresh steps seen taken even though direction given for taking fresh steps in fresh address.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Hina Raza
Party Age
47
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Perunelly Manoj
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.V.N.Gopalakrishnan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Arun Gopalakrishnan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Varun Gopalakrishnan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sun, 06/12/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 03/12/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won