Case Summary
Hijabul Jamal, the decree holder, filed a case against Rukhiya, Hajira, Fathima, and Muhammed Ismail regarding property delivery which resulted in the property being successfully delivered.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Property delivery
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The property was successfully delivered as per the order, and the Execution Petition was closed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Property delivered. Delivery recorded. EP closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Hijabul Jamal
- Party Age
- 40
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rukhiya
- Party Age
- 68
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hajira
- Party Age
- 33
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Fathima
- Party Age
- 31
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammed Ismail
- Party Age
- 44
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Property Delivery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Successful delivery of the property
Evidence:
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2016