Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 742 /2025

Case between HiBye Entertainments (OPC) Pvt. Ltd. vs Kochi Metro Rail Ltd. regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-09-08
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a petition for a permanent prohibitory injunction filed by HiBye Entertainments (OPC) Pvt. Ltd. against Kochi Metro Rail Ltd. The plaintiffs seek the appointment of an advocate commissioner to inspect the plaint schedule property and report on various matters.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for appointing an advocate commissioner to inspect the plaint schedule property to aid in a fair adjudication of the case.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Appointment of Advocate Commissioner
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for appointing an advocate commissioner to inspect the plaint schedule property to aid in a fair adjudication of the case.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The appointment of an advocate commissioner will aid the court to collect valuable inputs for a proper and fair adjudication of the above suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The present petition is filed by 2nd plaintiff to appoint advocate commissioner for urgently inspecting the plaint schedule property. The court is convinced that the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner will aid the court to collect valuable inputs for a proper and fair adjudication of the above suit.

Judgment Evidence:

In the light of the above discussion, the petition is allowed on the following terms: - Advocate Devika R. Krishna is appointed as the Commissioner in this case and whose remuneration shall be Rs.7,000/- which shall be paid directly to the Commissioner by the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
HiBye Entertainments (OPC) Pvt. Ltd.
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajeesh R
Party Age
33
Relation
Proprietor/Director
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kochi Metro Rail Ltd.
Relation
Represented by its The Managing Director
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The General Manager (F&A) In-Charge AR Kochi Metro Rail Ltd.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Joint General Manager (procurement), Kochi Metro Rail Ltd.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sr. DGM (Operations), Kochi Metro Rail Limited
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Arun Luckose Abraham
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Philia Koshy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sarun M S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P A Augustine
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rony Augustine
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to inspect the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The appointment of an Advocate Commissioner will aid the court to collect valuable inputs for a proper and fair adjudication of the above suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Advocate Commissioner Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court appointed an Advocate Commissioner to inspect the plaint schedule property.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between HiBye Entertainments (OPC) Pvt. Ltd. vs Kochi Metro Rail Ltd. regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between HiBye Entertainments (OPC) Pvt. Ltd. vs Kochi Metro Rail Ltd. regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won