Case Summary
Plaintiff Haskerali filed a suit for partition which was dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence and non-appearance of defendants.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
The suit for partition was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and non-appearance of the defendants.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for partition. No batta seen deposited. Plaintiff's counsel submitted that he has no instruction from his client.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Haskerali
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Aminakutty
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Naila Jasmin
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ansar
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Afseer
- Party Age
- 27
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ashiq Ali
- Party Age
- 17
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Alfiya
- Party Age
- 12
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Partition
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Partition of property sought by the plaintiff
Evidence:
Suit for partition. No batta seen deposited. Plaintiff's counsel submitted that he has no instruction from his client.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Haskerali vs Aminakutty et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Haskerali vs Aminakutty et al regarding partition