Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.982/2019

Case between Harshan vs Rahul.P.S. et al regarding a civil suit.

Court
II Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-03-15
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Harshan is the plaintiff in this case against Rahul.P.S. and others. The matter was about a civil suit that was settled before the court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff represented himself, while the defendants were absent. The counsel for the plaintiff stated that the matter was settled and the suit was not pressed, resulting in the dismissal of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff represented himself, while the defendants were absent. The counsel for the plaintiff stated that the matter was settled and the suit was not pressed, resulting in the dismissal of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The suit was settled and not pressed by the plaintiff.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The suit was settled and not pressed by the plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
Counsel for plaintiff filed memo stating that matter settled and suit not pressed.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed as not pressed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Harshan
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o late Kunjappan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rahul.P.S.
Party Age
22
Relation
S/o late Santhosh
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manjusha
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o late Santhosh
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rakendu
Party Age
20
Relation
D/o late Santhosh
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P.K. Chandran
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o late Krishnan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C.P.Saji
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Deepa Mohan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Counsel for plaintiff filed memo stating that matter settled and suit not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Harshan vs Rahul.P.S. et al regarding a civil suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Harshan vs Rahul.P.S. et al regarding a civil suit.

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won