Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 523/2025

Case between Harmony International Projects Private Limited vs Anas et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-11-20
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Harmony International Projects Private Limited and its Additional Director, Sanjid Kader, against Anas and others regarding a temporary prohibitory injunction to use a pathway. The plaintiffs claim a right of way over the property of the defendants, which the defendants dispute.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition for a temporary prohibitory injunction as the plaintiffs failed to prove a prima facie case or balance of convenience in their favor.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The petitioners did not establish a clear prima facie case for the right of way claimed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA stands dismissed. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Harmony International Projects Private Limited (Age not specified years) Hill View, Room No. 30/721-48, Krishnapoyil Padinhare Parambu, Kavoor Desom, Nellikode Village, Kozhikode, PIN - 673 016 Sanjid Kader (40 years years) Elite Gardenia, Muthuvara, Puzhakkal, Thrissur, PIN - 680 553

Defendants

Anas (Age not specified years) Valayath House, Opposite Ayur Hospital, Thrikakkara North Village, HMT Colony P.O., Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam, PIN - 683 503 Jameela (Age not specified years) Vathiyath House, Thaikhakara North Village, HMT Colony P.O, Kalamassery, Emathulam, PIN - 683 503 Haseena (Age not specified years) Vathiyath House, Thaikhakasa North Village, HMT Colony P.O, Kalamassery, Emathulam, PIN - 683 503 Abdul Azeez (Age not specified years) Vathiyath House, Thaikhakasa North Village, HMT Colony P.O, Kalamassery, Emathulam, PIN - 683 503

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The petitioners sought a temporary prohibitory injunction against the respondents to prevent them from obstructing the B schedule property.
Evidence:
In such circumstances, I am of the opinion that the petition is to be dismissed and is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Extract of the minutes of the meeting of the Board of Directors
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the authorization of the person who filed the suit to represent the plaintiff in legal matters.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Copy of sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences the purchase of the plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Photograph
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This photograph shows the alleged dumping of waste materials on the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Photographs
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These photographs show the alleged construction sought to be made by the respondents and the alleged B schedule pathway.
Reference:
Ext.A4 series
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This report was filed for the purpose of consideration of the petition.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Certified copy of document
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document supports the respondents' ownership of their property.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Certified copy of document
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document supports the respondents' ownership of their property.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Certified copy of document
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document supports the respondents' ownership of their property.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Certified copy of document
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document supports the respondents' ownership of their property.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Certified copy of document
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document supports the respondents' ownership of their property.
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type: Certified copy of document
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document supports the respondents' ownership of their property.
Reference:
Ext.B6
Document Type: Encumbrance certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document provides evidence related to the encumbrance status.
Reference:
Ext.B7
Document Type: Encumbrance certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document provides evidence related to the encumbrance status.
Reference:
Ext.B8
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This receipt serves as proof of tax payment for the property.
Reference:
Ext.B9
Document Type: Sketch
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This sketch is provided without proper context or date and is of limited evidentiary value.
Reference:
Ext.B10
Document Type: Photographs
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
These photographs relate to the property in question.
Reference:
Ext.B11 series
Document Type: Google Earth view
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
These views are provided to show the property from an aerial perspective.
Reference:
Ext.B12
Document Type: Google Earth view
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
These views are provided to show the property from an aerial perspective.
Reference:
Ext.B13
Document Type: Google Earth view
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
These views are provided to show the property from an aerial perspective.
Reference:
Ext.B14
Document Type: Sketch
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This sketch was prepared at the request of the respondent and is not from the court.
Reference:
Ext.B15
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This receipt is related to a transaction conducted by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B16
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This receipt is related to a transaction conducted by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B17
Document Type: Copy of complaint
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document shows the complaint filed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B18
Document Type: Receipt of Acknowledgment
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This receipt provides evidence of the acknowledgment of the complaint.
Reference:
Ext.B19
Document Type: Possession Certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This certificate indicates possession related to the defendant's property.
Reference:
Ext.B20

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases