Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.331/2021

Case between Harikrishna Varma et al vs Nineesh Thankachan et al regarding default dismissal of suit

Court
II Additional Munsiff
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-04-05
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, represented by Harikrishna Varma, filed a suit against the defendants, including Nineesh Thankachan, concerning a legal matter. The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of plaintiffs and defendants on the hearing date.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of both parties and the failure to file documents. The dismissal was given as the plaintiffs did not represent themselves.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Harikrishna Varma (26 years) Ambady House, Chennankulangara Road, Edappally.P.O., Ernakulam, Kochi – 682 024 Binu Jacob (31 years) Edathottiyil House, Marottichuvadu, Sahakarana Road, Edapally, Ernakulam, Kochi – 682 024 M/s. Leeway Fitness (Age not specified years) 2nd floor, Holy Tuesday Shopping Mall, Kaloor

Defendants

Nineesh Thankachan (33 years) Aluvassery House, Bhavans South Road, Elamakkara.P.O., Pin – 682 026 Sreejith.N.U. (31 years) Neryamkottil House, MRA – 22, Madavan Master Lane, Mamangalam, Palarivattom.P.O., Kochi – 25 Sibin James (32 years) Kochuveettil House, Thrikkakkara.P.O., Unichira, Ernakulam, Pin – 682 021

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to absence of plaintiffs and defendants.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases