Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.331/2021

Case between Harikrishna Varma et al vs Nineesh Thankachan et al regarding default dismissal of suit

Court
II Additional Munsiff
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-04-05
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, represented by Harikrishna Varma, filed a suit against the defendants, including Nineesh Thankachan, concerning a legal matter. The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of plaintiffs and defendants on the hearing date.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of both parties and the failure to file documents. The dismissal was given as the plaintiffs did not represent themselves.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of both parties and the failure to file documents. The dismissal was given as the plaintiffs did not represent themselves.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Harikrishna Varma
Party Age
26
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Binu Jacob
Party Age
31
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Leeway Fitness
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nineesh Thankachan
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreejith.N.U.
Party Age
31
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sibin James
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.R. Vinod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.S. Letha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aswin Venugopal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anu Ros
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to absence of plaintiffs and defendants.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Harikrishna Varma et al vs Nineesh Thankachan et al regarding default dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Harikrishna Varma et al vs Nineesh Thankachan et al regarding default dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 04/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 04/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won