Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 90/2020

Case between Haridasan C.P. vs Dr. Ganesh Mohan et al regarding rent control petition

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2024-12-17
Duration
Case Closed
Tue, 12/17/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Haridasan C.P. filed a rent control petition against Dr. Ganesh Mohan and Dr. Parvathy Deth. The petition was dismissed for default due to the petitioner's continuous absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition was dismissed because the petitioner was absent for multiple hearings. The court pronounced the order in open court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed because the petitioner was absent for multiple hearings. The court pronounced the order in open court.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner failed to appear in court despite repeated postings.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner failed to appear in court despite repeated postings.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner is continuously absent for last several postings.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence petition is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Haridasan C.P.
Party Age
71
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dr. Ganesh Mohan
Party Age
39
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dr. Parvathy Deth
Party Age
38
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Rent control petition, Vakalath, Related documents
Defendants Documents
Objection to rent control petition, Vakalath

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.N. Sasidharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Enoch David Simon Joel
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S. Sreedev
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rony Jose
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The petition was dismissed for default due to the petitioner's continuous absence.
Evidence:
Hence petition is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Haridasan C.P. vs Dr. Ganesh Mohan et al regarding rent control petition
Case Code Year
Case between Haridasan C.P. vs Dr. Ganesh Mohan et al regarding rent control petition

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 12/17/2024 - 12:00
From
Sun, 12/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between V.K.Jayachandran vs Nisha M.V regarding petition under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control)Act, 1965
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown
Case between Liya George vs Sulaiman regarding Petition under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965
THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Dismissed
Case between Robin Thomas Vaidyan vs RAHA Ayurveda Hospital et al regarding eviction
Court of the Third Additional Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Rent Control Petition Unknown
Case between Mrs. Susan Jacob John @ Susan John & Dr. Maria Kuriakose vs Mr. Annekot Ramadasan Padmakumar regarding Petition filed under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala (Buildings Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965
The Third Additional Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Munir Gul Mohammed Sait et al vs K.M. Abdulla et al regarding Rent Control Petition
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown