R.C.P. No. 90/2020

Case between Haridasan C.P. vs Dr. Ganesh Mohan et al regarding rent control petition

Court

THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER

Judge

SMT. REEJA R. NAIR

Order Date

2024-12-17

Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)

Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Haridasan C.P. filed a rent control petition against Dr. Ganesh Mohan and Dr. Parvathy Deth. The petition was dismissed for default due to the petitioner's continuous absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The petition was dismissed because the petitioner was absent for multiple hearings. The court pronounced the order in open court.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Rent Control Petition

Final Judgment

Key Reasoning:
The petitioner failed to appear in court despite repeated postings.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence petition is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Haridasan C.P. (71 years years) Chelachuvattil House, Kangarappady, Thrikkakara North village, Kananyannur Taluk, Ernakulam PIN 682 021

Defendants

Dr. Ganesh Mohan (39 years years) Kailas (H) Vellakkinar Ambalappuzha P.O, Ambalappuzha Taluk, Alappuzha Dist-688561 Dr. Parvathy Deth (38 years years) Kailas (H) Vellakkinar, Ambalappuzha P.O, Ambalappuzha Taluk, Alappuzha Dist-688561

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

The petition was dismissed for default due to the petitioner's continuous absence.

Evidence: