Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 653/2022

Case between Haridas vs Shafi Bhaskaran Nair et al regarding civil suit

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2026-01-06
Duration
Case Closed
Tue, 01/06/2026 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Haridas, a retired government employee, filed a suit against Shafi Bhaskaran Nair, Muraleedharan V V, and Bindu S Pillai. The suit was dismissed by the court due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of intent to proceed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff and a lack of representation. All interim orders related to the case were vacated.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff and a lack of representation. All interim orders related to the case were vacated.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiff does not intend to proceed with the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the plaintiff does not intend to proceed with the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Satisfied that plaintiff does not intend to proceed with suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed. All interim orders shall stand vacated.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Haridas
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shafi Bhaskaran Nair
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muraleedharan V V
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bindu S Pillai
Party Age
55
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sunil N
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
D M Sajeevan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sherry J Thomas
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Renish Raveendran
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
C K Govindan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
L P Aravindakshan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed as the plaintiff does not intend to proceed.
Evidence:
Satisfied that plaintiff does not intend to proceed with suit. Hence suit is dismissed.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
All interim orders shall stand vacated.
Evidence:
All interim orders shall stand vacated.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Haridas vs Shafi Bhaskaran Nair et al regarding civil suit
Case Code Year
Case between Haridas vs Shafi Bhaskaran Nair et al regarding civil suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
Tue, 01/06/2026 - 12:00
From
Thu, 01/01/2026 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/21/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won