Case Summary
Haneefa filed a case against Enikkutty for property delivery, and the court ordered the property to be delivered and recorded.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Property delivery
Case Type
Civil Suit - Property Delivery
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the property to be delivered, and the delivery was recorded.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Property delivered. Delivery recorded. EP closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Haneefa
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- Self
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Enikkutty
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- Self
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Abdul Hameed
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate appearing for Enikkutty
- Appearance Type
- Unknown
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Property Delivery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Order for property delivery executed
Evidence:
Property delivered. Delivery recorded. EP closed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Property Delivery
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2017