Case Summary
Hamza filed suit for partition against multiple defendants. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and the counsel had no instructions.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
The suit for partition was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of instructions to counsel.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for partition. Plaintiff is not present. Name of the plaintiff is called absent. The counsel for the plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Hamza
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Musthafa
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Saidali
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ali
- Party Age
- 50
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Palleema
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Unknown
Defendants Documents
Unknown
Advocates
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Hamza vs Musthafa et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Hamza vs Musthafa et al regarding partition