Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.516/2015

Case between Gracy Mathai @ Anna vs L. Balachandran regarding dismissal for default.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Reghunath N.S.
Order Date
2024-03-07
Duration
Case Closed
Thu, 03/07/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs Gracy Mathai @ Anna and Jipson K. Mathew filed a suit against the defendants L. Balachandran and Sreelathja. The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence and lack of filed proof affidavits.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence and lack of filed proof affidavits.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' failure to appear and submit necessary documentation.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' failure to appear and submit necessary documentation.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. No Proof Affidavit filed. Hence, name of plaintiff called, not present.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Gracy Mathai @ Anna
Party Age
71
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jipson K. Mathew
Party Age
41
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
L. Balachandran
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreelathja
Party Age
49
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A.K. Gopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aarya . G
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P. Viswanathan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
G. Jayasankar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.V. Vinod
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vishnu. R.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Gracy Mathai @ Anna vs L. Balachandran regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Gracy Mathai @ Anna vs L. Balachandran regarding dismissal for default.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 01/01/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 03/07/2024 - 12:00
From
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won