Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1017/2022

Case between Graceland Charitable Trust vs V. B Sreedharan regarding suit dismissal.

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-12-05
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Graceland Charitable Trust as the plaintiff and V. B Sreedharan as the defendant. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence during evidence presentation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court concluded that the plaintiff was absent and not ready for evidence when the case was called, leading to an automatic dismissal.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court concluded that the plaintiff was absent and not ready for evidence when the case was called, leading to an automatic dismissal.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence resulted in the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence resulted in the dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. No representation. Name called absent. Defendant present. Plaintiff is not present or ready for evidence in listed case.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit dismissed. Pending I.A’s closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Graceland Charitable Trust
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
V. B Sreedharan
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M. R Hariraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Thanuja Roshan George
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Viswajith C. K
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Gisha G. Raj
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rejivue K. C
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Alina Anna Kose
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vidya A. K
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Akhila S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Megna Mariyam M
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jacob Mathew Manalil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Priya Elizabeth Babu
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed. Pending I.A’s closed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Graceland Charitable Trust vs V. B Sreedharan regarding suit dismissal.
Case Code Year
Case between Graceland Charitable Trust vs V. B Sreedharan regarding suit dismissal.

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 12/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won