Case Summary
Gordian Fibrenamics and its managing partners are suing Suresh Engineering Works for failing to complete a contract for installing coir fibre making machines. The plaintiffs claim to have suffered losses due to the defendant's neglect and demand payment for the remaining balance as per the agreement.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
₹2,40,000 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs provided uncontested evidence proving their entitlement to the claimed amount.
The plaintiffs provided uncontested evidence proving their entitlement to the claimed amount.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I. The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 2,40,000/- (Rupees two lakhs forty thousand only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant and his assets.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Asif (33 years years)
Pazhagattu House, Peringala, Ernakulam District – 683 565
Basheer (60 years years)
Pazhagattu House, Peringala, Ernakulam District – 683 565
Gordian Fibrenamics (Age not specified years)
Door No. 17/26, 1st Floor, A.N.U Shopping Complex, Kozhinijampara, Chittur, Palakkad – 678 555
Defendants
Suresh Engineering Works (Age not specified years)
Kalathiparambil Road, Cochin – 682016
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff an amount of 2,40,000/- with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I. The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 2,40,000/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant and his assets.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original of the Agreement between the plaintiffs and the defendant concerning the installation of coir fiber making machines.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy of the lawyer notice sent to the defendant to complete the remaining works as per the agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Commission Report filed by Adv. Commissioner Stalin James M.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Valuation Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Valuation Report concerning the costs necessary to complete the work as per the agreement.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)