Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1503/2018

Case between Gopinathan.K.P et al vs Edappally Central N.S.S Karayogam et al regarding a civil suit

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Reghunath N.S.
Order Date
2024-04-11
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs include Gopinathan.K.P and others who brought a case against Edappally Central N.S.S Karayogam and others. The court dismissed the case as the plaintiff filed a not press memo.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The case was dismissed as the plaintiff opted not to pursue it.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed as the plaintiff opted not to pursue it.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff filed a not press memo.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff filed a not press memo.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff filed a not press memo.

Judgment Evidence:

In the light of reasons stated in the memo, the petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Gopinathan.K.P
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Edappally Central N.S.S Karayogam
Party Age
61
Relation
represented by its Secretary, C.A. Pradeep
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
T.S.Maya
Party Age
54
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R. Rajesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sibi Karun
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
C.N. Sreekumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sabu P. Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Manju Paul
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anil Prasad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Dinesh R. Shenoy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Saumya T.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Joseph George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sanal K.M.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vineeth R. Menon
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The plaintiff filed a not press memo, and the petition was dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
the petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Gopinathan.K.P et al vs Edappally Central N.S.S Karayogam et al regarding a civil suit
Case Code Year
Case between Gopinathan.K.P et al vs Edappally Central N.S.S Karayogam et al regarding a civil suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 04/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 04/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won