Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
S.T. No:125/2017

Case between Gopi Mohanan vs Lokanathan regarding offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act

Court
JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -II, TIRUR
Judge
Sri. Jankish Narayanan
Order Date
2019-10-31
Duration
2 years 10 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a complaint filed by Gopi Mohanan against Lokanathan for an offence under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court ultimately found the accused not guilty due to the complainant's absence and lack of evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The complaint was dismissed due to the complainant's repeated absences and failure to present evidence despite multiple opportunities.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The complaint was dismissed due to the complainant's repeated absences and failure to present evidence despite multiple opportunities.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the complainant was not vigilant in pursuing the matter and failed to provide a plausible explanation for his absence.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the complainant was not vigilant in pursuing the matter and failed to provide a plausible explanation for his absence.
Supporting Evidence
The complainant has been given several opportunities for adducing evidence. But, he remains absent on all these days and failed to obey the directions given by the Court.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the complaint is dismissed under S. 256 (1) Criminal Procedure Code.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Gopi Mohanan
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Lokanathan
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V. Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. M.K Moosakutty
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The complaint filed by the complainant is dismissed due to absence and lack of evidence.
Evidence:
In the result, the complaint is dismissed under S. 256 (1) Criminal Procedure Code.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Gopi Mohanan vs Lokanathan regarding offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
Case Code Year
Case between Gopi Mohanan vs Lokanathan regarding offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram District
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 10/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Parappara Abdu vs Moideenkutty regarding jurisdiction transfer
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Criminal Case Unknown
Case between Kunhai vs Abdu Shukkur regarding withdrawal of complaint
Munsiff Magistrate at Tirur, Malappuram
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Kunhipathumma vs Abdu Shukkur regarding withdrawal of complaint
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Kunhali vs Abdu Shukkur regarding withdrawal of complaint
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Muhammed Kabeer vs Abdul Azeez regarding permission to withdraw complaint
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Criminal Case Defendant Won