Case Summary
Petitioners Gopi et al allowed with paying costs to respondent Achipra Veettil Manikandan et al.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Allowed petition with costs
Case Type
Civil Case
Final Judgment
No
The petition is allowed on the condition to pay costs to the first respondent before 09-02-2015.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Petition is allowed on condition to pay cost of Rs4000/- to the first respondent on or before 09-02-2015.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Gopi
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Valsala
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sarojini
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Achipra Veettil Manikandan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jayakrishnan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Manalodi Aliyamu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Achipraveettil Mohanan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C.Nandakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- C.Shanmughan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Undefined
Outcome:
Unknown
Description:
Petition allowed with conditions to pay costs to first respondent
Evidence:
Petition is allowed on condition to pay cost of Rs4000/- to the first respondent on or before 09-02-2015.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Unknown
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.P
Case Code Year
2014