Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 390 OF 2014

Case between Gopalan vs Sajeevan et al regarding injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-11-25
Duration
3 years
Case Closed
Sat, 11/25/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff, Gopalan, and defendants, Sajeevan, Sreedharan, and Leela, residing in Tirur Taluk, compromised the suit regarding an injunction. Defendants agreed not to obstruct plaintiff's possession as per the lawful terms of compromise.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff and defendants reached a lawful compromise regarding an injunction.
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff and defendants reached a lawful compromise regarding an injunction.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Not available

Judgment Evidence:

Compromise IA.2801/2017 shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Gopalan
Party Age
71
Relation
S/o. Korattil Ayyan @ Ayyutti
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sajeevan
Party Age
31
Relation
S/o. Kundankandathil Sreedharan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreedharan
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o. Kundankandathil Ravunni
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Leela
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o.Kundankandathil Sreedharan
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. C. Nandakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Deepa Gopinath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.M.Neelakandan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff seeks injunction against defendants
Evidence:
Compromise IA.2801/2017 shall form part of the decree.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Settlement and Mediation
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Gopalan vs Sajeevan et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Gopalan vs Sajeevan et al regarding injunction

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Tue, 11/25/2014 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 11/25/2017 - 12:00
From
Wed, 11/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Thu, 11/30/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Nalakath Muhammed Salih et al vs Kayattum Parambil Ibrahim et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Raphy Kooliyath vs Krishnakumar.K regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Muhammed Kutty vs Saidalavi et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed
Case between Yousef vs Mandakathingal Kunhimuhammed et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Arangath Parambil Ali vs Abdul Rasaq et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Dismissed