Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Restoration Petition. 140/2024 in OS 128/2019

Case between Gopalakrishnan Nair vs Kooroppada Gramapanchayath et al regarding restoration of a dismissed suit

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-07-23
Duration
approximately-9 months
Case Closed
Wed, 07/23/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Gopalakrishnan Nair filed a petition to restore a suit that was dismissed due to his absence. The court considered his health condition and the necessity of a commission report for the case.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition for restoration of the suit as the plaintiff failed to prove sufficient reasons for his absence on the previous date.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition for restoration of the suit as the plaintiff failed to prove sufficient reasons for his absence on the previous date.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff could not establish sufficient reasons for his absence.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff could not establish sufficient reasons for his absence.
Supporting Evidence
As the plaintiff could not establish that there was sufficient reasons for his absence on 05.09.2024, this petition cannot be allowed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result this petition is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Gopalakrishnan Nair
Party Age
77
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kooroppada Gramapanchayath
Relation
represented by its Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayan
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Tomy
Party Age
50
Relation
Panchayath Contractor
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Saji Koduvathu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Josekutty Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Restoration
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Petitioner prayed to restore the suit which was dismissed on 05.09.2024.
Evidence:
As the plaintiff could not establish that there was sufficient reasons for his absence on 05.09.2024, this petition cannot be allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Gopalakrishnan Nair vs Kooroppada Gramapanchayath et al regarding restoration of a dismissed suit
Case Code Year
Case between Gopalakrishnan Nair vs Kooroppada Gramapanchayath et al regarding restoration of a dismissed suit

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam Taluk
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 07/23/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Gramapanchayath

Similar Cases

Case between Dilip K John vs Naisy regarding Restoration Petition
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Biju K Mathew vs Sigtech Marketing Private Limited et al regarding restoration petition
The Principal Munsiff, Kottayam
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between P C Cherian et al vs T A Kurian et al regarding Restoration of Petition.
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between P C Cherian et al vs T A Kurian et al regarding dismissal of restoration petition
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between Elsamma Thomas vs Jomy Scaria et al regarding Restoration Petition
The Principal Munsiff, Kottayam
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won