Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ST No:28/2018

Case between Gokulam Chits & Finance Co-Pvt. Ltd et al vs Haseena et al regarding dishonoured cheque

Court
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II
Judge
Sri. Jankish Narayanan
Order Date
2019-12-10
Duration
1 year
Case Closed
Tue, 12/10/2019 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Complaint filed by Gokulam Chits & Finance alleging dishonour of cheque under section 138 of N.I. Act. The complainant withdrew the complaint with permission.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The complainant withdrew the complaint, and the accused was acquitted under Section 257 Cr.P.C.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Acquittal under Section 257 Cr.P.C.
Case Type
Cheque Bounce Case
Final Judgment
No
The complainant withdrew the complaint, and the accused was acquitted under Section 257 Cr.P.C.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

The complainant filed a petition seeking permission to withdraw the complaint and having satisfied that there are sufficient grounds for granting permission, the complainant is permitted to withdraw his complaint. In this result, the accused is acquitted. Under section 257 Cr. P.C. His bail bond stands canceled and he is set at liberty.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Gokulam Chits & Finance Co-Pvt. Ltd
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Haseena
Party Age
43
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Unknown
Defendants Documents
Unknown

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Acquittal
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Complainant's withdrawal of the complaint resulted in the accused being acquitted under Section 257 Cr.P.C.
Evidence:
Complainant filed a petition seeking permission to withdraw the complaint and having satisfied that there are sufficient grounds for granting the permission, the complainant is permitted to withdraw his complaint. In this result, the accused is acquitted. Under section 257 Cr. P.C. His bail bond stands canceled, and he is set at liberty.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Cheque Bounce Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Gokulam Chits & Finance Co-Pvt. Ltd et al vs Haseena et al regarding dishonoured cheque
Case Code Year
Case between Gokulam Chits & Finance Co-Pvt. Ltd et al vs Haseena et al regarding dishonoured cheque

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Out-of-Court Settlement
Nature of Cheque Case

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Mon, 12/10/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 12/10/2019 - 12:00
From
Sun, 12/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Shajahan vs Noushad Babu regarding dishonored cheque
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Cheque Bounce Defendant Won
Case between K.P. Kabeer vs Shajahan Babu regarding dishonoured cheque
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Tirur
Criminal Case - N.I. Act - Cheque Dishonour Defendant Won
Case between Suresh Babu vs Nisar U.T regarding dishonour of cheque
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Negotiable Instruments Act Plaintiff Won
Case between Aboobacker vs Abdul Rasak regarding cheque dishonour
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II
Criminal Case - Cheque dishonour Unknown
Case between Muhamed Shaji vs Mayaboob.C regarding dishonour of cheque
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act Defendant Won