Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.907/2019

Case between Gimmichan.K.M. vs Jencey.K.K., Ratheesh Thomas, Kochi Corporation regarding dismissal for default

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-02-23
Duration
approximately-4 years 11 months
Case Closed
Fri, 02/23/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a suit filed by Gimmichan.K.M. against Jencey.K.K., Ratheesh Thomas, and Kochi Corporation. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and the failure to file necessary documents. There were no costs awarded.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and the failure to file necessary documents. There were no costs awarded.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not file the required documents, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and did not file the required documents, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Satisfied plaintiff is not interested in adducing evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Gimmichan.K.M.
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jencey.K.K.
Party Age
36
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ratheesh Thomas
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kochi Corporation
Relation
represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Hari Sharma.M.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Varghese.P.Chacko
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sobhan George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of evidence.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default. No costs.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Gimmichan.K.M. vs Jencey.K.K., Ratheesh Thomas, Kochi Corporation regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Gimmichan.K.M. vs Jencey.K.K., Ratheesh Thomas, Kochi Corporation regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 02/23/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 02/23/2024 - 12:00
From
Thu, 02/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 02/29/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won