Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No.444/2022

Case between GESCHAFT Group vs TATA Motors Finance Pvt. Ltd. regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-12-06
Duration
Case Closed
Fri, 12/06/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves GESCHAFT Group as the plaintiff and TATA Motors Finance Pvt. Ltd. as the defendant. The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation for evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence during the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not present evidence for the case.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent no representation. Listed case. Plaintiff not present or ready for evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
GESCHAFT Group
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Branch Manager, TATA Motors Finance Pvt. Ltd.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.J Polly
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jijo P.J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.R Ramesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P. Fazil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jayasree Manoj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jithin Paul Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ann Mary Francis
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sruthy R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Prabitha C
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent no representation. Hence dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between GESCHAFT Group vs TATA Motors Finance Pvt. Ltd. regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between GESCHAFT Group vs TATA Motors Finance Pvt. Ltd. regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
Fri, 12/06/2024 - 12:00
From
Sun, 12/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won