Case Summary
Georgekutty is the plaintiff in this case, while K.V.Abraham is the defendant. The court ruled that the plaint is rejected due to non-payment of balance court fee.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint for non-payment of the balance court fee. The plaintiff was given chances previously to rectify this issue.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected due to the plaintiff's failure to remit the balance court fee despite being given chances.
The plaint was rejected due to the plaintiff's failure to remit the balance court fee despite being given chances.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected due to the plaintiff's failure to remit the balance court fee despite being given chances.
The plaint was rejected due to the plaintiff's failure to remit the balance court fee despite being given chances.
Supporting Evidence
Chances given already.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, plaint is rejected for non payment of Balance court fee.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Georgekutty
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K.V.Abraham
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.Martin Jose
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaint is rejected for non payment of Balance court fee.
Evidence:
Hence, plaint is rejected for non payment of Balance court fee.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Georgekutty vs K.V.Abraham regarding non payment of balance court fee
Case Code Year
Case between Georgekutty vs K.V.Abraham regarding non payment of balance court fee