Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 428/2024

Case between GeorgeKutty vs Abdul Salam regarding rejection of plaint

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-11-13
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves GeorgeKutty as the plaintiff and Abdul Salam as the defendant. The plaint was rejected due to unpaid balance court fees.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff not having paid the necessary balance court fees.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiff had not paid the required court fees.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence plaint is rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

GeorgeKutty (64 years) Punnakuzhiyil House, Thuppampady, Mulanthuruthy, Pin- 682005

Defendants

Abdul Salam (60 years) Ambattoor Desom, Amballoor Village, Kanayannoor Thaluk, Pin- 682315

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff's plaint was rejected due to non-payment of court fees.
Evidence:
Balance Court Fee not seen paid so far. Hence plaint is rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases