Case Summary
The case involves GeorgeKutty as the plaintiff and Abdul Salam as the defendant. The plaint was rejected due to unpaid balance court fees.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff not having paid the necessary balance court fees.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiff had not paid the required court fees.
The court found that the plaintiff had not paid the required court fees.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the plaintiff had not paid the required court fees.
The court found that the plaintiff had not paid the required court fees.
Supporting Evidence
The court rejected the plaint due to unpaid balance court fees.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence plaint is rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- GeorgeKutty
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- S/o Mathai John
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdul Salam
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o Ahammed Thliyappadath
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P Martin Jose
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Plaintiff's plaint was rejected due to non-payment of court fees.
Evidence:
Balance Court Fee not seen paid so far. Hence plaint is rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between GeorgeKutty vs Abdul Salam regarding rejection of plaint
Case Code Year
Case between GeorgeKutty vs Abdul Salam regarding rejection of plaint