Case Summary
The plaintiff George Mathew filed a suit against the defendant Geetha. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff's counsel in the absence of the defendant's representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff's counsel. The defendant did not appear in court.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- George Mathew
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Geetha
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Siji Balakrishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Dr. K.M. Geroge
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Chithra P.George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was not pressed by the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Counsel for the plaintiff submits that suit is not pressed and endorsed the same in the plaint. Hence, the suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between George Mathew vs Geetha regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between George Mathew vs Geetha regarding dismissal of suit