Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1259/2003

Case between George et al vs K.Vasudevan Pillai et al regarding suit dismissal for default

Court
THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-08-30
Duration
approximately-20 years
Case Closed
Fri, 08/30/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs are George and others, while the defendants are K.Vasudevan Pillai and others. The case has been pending for over 20 years and was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The case was dismissed for default due to the plaintiffs' absence despite being included in the special list for trial. The case had been pending for over 20 years.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed for default due to the plaintiffs' absence despite being included in the special list for trial. The case had been pending for over 20 years.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, Suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
George
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rosely George
Party Age
51
Relation
W/o late George
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Laiza Justin
Party Age
21
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Liza Siju
Party Age
20
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Robert George
Party Age
15
Relation
S/o late George
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.Vasudevan Pillai
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Harihara Menon
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.Madhu
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sanal K.M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anup T Paul
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sam Issac Pothiyil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Suraja S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
N.K.Mohanlal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.J.Joseph Panikassery
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between George et al vs K.Vasudevan Pillai et al regarding suit dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between George et al vs K.Vasudevan Pillai et al regarding suit dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/2003 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 08/30/2024 - 12:00
From
Thu, 08/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won