Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 312/2021

Case between George et al vs Karthikeyan regarding dismissal of suit for default

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-08-05
Duration
Case Closed
Tue, 08/05/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

George and Sindhu George are the plaintiffs, and Karthikeyan is the defendant. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiffs failed to appear and present their case.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiffs' failure to appear. All interim orders were vacated.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiffs' failure to appear. All interim orders were vacated.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiffs did not intend to proceed with the suit as they failed to appear.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the plaintiffs did not intend to proceed with the suit as they failed to appear.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff No.1 and 2 name called absent. Not present. No proof affidavit seen filed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed for default. All interim orders stand vacated.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
George
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sindhu George
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Karthikeyan
Party Age
73
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Joseph Shylan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
AT Anilkumar (Anil Mamala)
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jose Paul Thottam
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aiswarya Sajeev
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiffs' absence.
Evidence:
Hence satisfied that plaintiff does not intend to proceed with suit. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between George et al vs Karthikeyan regarding dismissal of suit for default
Case Code Year
Case between George et al vs Karthikeyan regarding dismissal of suit for default

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
Tue, 08/05/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won