Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 827/2011

Case between George et al vs C.V.Antony et al regarding civil suit

Court
I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-11-16
Duration
approximately-13 years 2 months
Case Closed
Sat, 11/16/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, George and others, filed a suit against the defendants, C.V.Antony and C.A.Antony. The court dismissed the suit for default because none of the plaintiffs were present at the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiffs' absence at the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiffs' absence at the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs did not appear in court, nor was any representation made.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs did not appear in court, nor was any representation made.
Supporting Evidence
None of the plaintiffs are present. No proof affidavit seen filed.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
George
Party Age
66
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Paskal @ Francis
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jacob
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Tommy @ Thomas
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Baby
Party Age
68
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C.V.Antony
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C.A.Antony
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Binni Kamal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Carlton Thomas
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T.B.Mini
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to absence of plaintiffs
Evidence:
Hence the Suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between George et al vs C.V.Antony et al regarding civil suit
Case Code Year
Case between George et al vs C.V.Antony et al regarding civil suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
Sat, 11/16/2024 - 12:00
From
Fri, 11/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 11/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won