Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 683/2022

Case between George Cleetus M A vs Sheela Sojan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-10-16
Duration
approximately-3 years 29 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

George Cleetus M A is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Sheela Sojan and her husband Sojan, alleging unlawful dispossession from property. The case involves a dispute over ownership and possession rights concerning a jointly owned property after the death of the plaintiff's wife.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court partially decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendants from dispossessing him from the property while acknowledging the defendants' rights as co-owners.
Judgment Favored
Partial
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction from dispossessing the plaintiff from the plaint A schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed partly with costs as follows: 1) The defendant and their men are restrained by permanent prohibitory injunction from dispossessing the plaintiff from plaint A schedule property forcefully.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

George Cleetus M A (53 years years) Manayathu House, Panambukad, Vallarpadam P O, Mulavukad Village, Ernakulam District – 682 504

Defendants

Sheela Sojan (47 years years) Pulikkathara House, Gothuruthu P O, Ernakulam District – 683 516 Sojan (49 years years) Pulikkathara House, Gothuruthu P O, Ernakulam District – 683 516

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Seeking to restrain the defendants and their men from dispossessing the plaintiff from the plaint A schedule property.
Evidence:
The court is satisfied that the plaintiff has every right to reside therein and he cannot be dispossessed by the defendant forcefully.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Request for costs to be awarded in favor of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, court does not find any reason for not awarding costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Marriage Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to establish the relationship between the plaintiff and the deceased wife.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the claim over the property by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the death of the plaintiff's wife, which is crucial for inheritance claims.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Official Document for Covid-19 Death
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supports the claim regarding the circumstances of the deceased's passing.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates the plaintiff's ongoing financial responsibility for the property.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Land Tribunal Document
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes ownership and boundary details concerning the property.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Gift Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Claims that the first defendant has rightful ownership of the property in dispute.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Used to demonstrate payment of taxes related to the defendant's claim on the property.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Supports the defendant's position regarding property maintenance.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Further corroborates the defendant's claim regarding ownership and tax responsibility.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Provided findings relevant to the property conditions and possession during the court proceedings.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Mon, 09/19/2022 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases