Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 583/2024

Case between Gely George vs Sini S Krishnan et al regarding civil procedure

Court
THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-10-14
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Gely George filed a suit against Sini S Krishnan and Mahesh B. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence during the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not represent the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and did not represent the case.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent, not represented. Counsel holding the vakalath for the plaintiff had already submitted that they are having no instruction from the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Gely George
Party Age
45
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sini S Krishnan
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mahesh B
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Praharsh krishna
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aishwarya Kalesh
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
H.Nujumudeen
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Antony Shyju
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sherin Achu Ninan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rekha M.M
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Santhosh K
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Afnas Meeran
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Gely George vs Sini S Krishnan et al regarding civil procedure
Case Code Year
Case between Gely George vs Sini S Krishnan et al regarding civil procedure

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 10/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won