Case Summary
This case involves a plaintiff, Geetha, who was absent during the hearing. The defendant is Latheesh Kumar. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and there was no representation.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Geetha
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Latheesh Kumar
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.K. Sreevalsakrishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anupama M.R.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Denny Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Lijo Raju
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Geetha vs Latheesh Kumar regarding suit dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Geetha vs Latheesh Kumar regarding suit dismissal for default