Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP 98/2025

Case between Geetha T. M vs T. M. Sreeja et al regarding Delivery of possession.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-07-14
Duration
Case Code No.
98
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Geetha T. M as the petitioner and T. M. Sreeja, Dr. Unnikrishnan T. M, and Remma T. M as respondents regarding the delivery of possession of property. The court has delivered the plot as ordered.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the delivery of possession of the property to the petitioner, Geetha T. M. The execution petition has been closed with full satisfaction recorded.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plot B1 delivered.
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the delivery of possession of the property to the petitioner, Geetha T. M. The execution petition has been closed with full satisfaction recorded.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petition was filed under the Civil Procedure Code's Execution provisions, leading to successful delivery of the property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petition was filed under the Civil Procedure Code's Execution provisions, leading to successful delivery of the property.
Supporting Evidence
This petition filed under Order XXI Rule 35 of the Civil Procedure Code. Delivery effected.

Judgment Evidence:

Delivery effected. Plot B1 delivered. Full satisfaction recorded. EP closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Geetha. T. M
Party Age
56
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
T. M. SREEJA
Party Age
46
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
DR. UNNIKRISHNAN. T. M
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
REMA. T. M
Party Age
49
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K. Ranjith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
I. Rajan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Delivery effected. Plot B1 delivered.
Evidence:
Delivery effected. Plot B1 delivered.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

EP 94/2024
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Execution Petition Unknown
Case between IRINGANNOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. vs NISAR et al regarding execution petition.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between KAVILUMPARA RURAL EMPLOYEES & WORKERS WELFARE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. et al vs SUNIL. K et al regarding EP proceedings.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Asya vs Sameera regarding execution proceedings.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between T K Abdul Salam vs Kunhammad regarding execution petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Execution Petition Unknown