Case Summary
Gangadharan accused Manammal Babu of committing offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Acquittal
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Final Judgment
No
The court acquitted the accused on the basis of compounding the offence under Section 147(b) of the Negotiable Instrument Act.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned
Judgment Evidence:
The accused is acquitted.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Gangadharan
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Manammal Babu
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Complainant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.M.T.Shabu
- Appearance Type
- Unknown
- Party Role
- Accused
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Pathmakumar.K.A
- Appearance Type
- Unknown
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Unknown
Outcome:
Acquitted
Description:
Accused acquitted
Evidence:
The accused is acquitted.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between Gangadharan vs Manammal Babu regarding cheque dishonour
Case Code Year
Case between Gangadharan vs Manammal Babu regarding cheque dishonour
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case