Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
S.T. 156/2020

Case between Ganeshan U vs Mini Saju regarding dishonour of cheque

Court
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – V
Judge
Smt. Indu P Raj
Order Date
2025-12-27
Duration
approximately-3 years 3 months
Case Code No.
156
Case Closed
Sat, 12/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The complainant, Ganeshan U, filed a complaint against Mini Saju for defaulting on a loan of ₹2,00,000 evidenced by a dishonoured cheque. The court found Mini Saju guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Mini Saju was found guilty of dishonouring a cheque issued to Ganeshan U. She was sentenced to one month of imprisonment and fined ₹2,00,000.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Compensation amounting to ₹2,00,000 with 9% interest
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
Mini Saju was found guilty of dishonouring a cheque issued to Ganeshan U. She was sentenced to one month of imprisonment and fined ₹2,00,000.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court established that the cheque was issued in discharge of a legally enforceable debt and all statutory requirements were met.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Once the cheque and dishonour are proved, Sections 118(a) and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act mandate a presumption that the cheque was issued for consideration and in discharge of a legally enforceable debt.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the accused is convicted under Section 255(2) Cr.P.C.(1) He is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one (1) month and to pay a fine of 2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakh only).

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ganeshan U
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mini Saju
Party Age
38
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Cheque dated 30.09.2020, Dishonour memo dated 01.10.2020, Copy of lawyers notice dated 09.10.2020
Defendants Documents
Copy of ration card, Copy of SSLC Book, Copy of FIR No.0871

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ponnu.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.Rajeev
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Compensation awarded to the complainant for the dishonoured cheque.
Evidence:
The entire fine amount of 2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakh only) shall be paid to the Complainant as compensation under Section 357(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Relief Type: Imprisonment
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The accused is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month.
Evidence:
The accused is convicted under Section 255(2) Cr.P.C. He is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one (1) month.
Relief Type: Imprisonment
Outcome: Granted
Description:
In default of payment of fine, additional imprisonment is imposed.
Evidence:
In default of payment of fine, the Accused shall undergo simple imprisonment for a further period of two (2) months.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The cheque issued by the accused toward repayment of a loan.
Reference:
Ext.P1
Document Type: Dishonour memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The dishonour memo evidencing that the cheque was dishonoured for 'Funds Insufficient'.
Reference:
Ext.P2
Document Type: Lawyers notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The notice sent to the accused after cheque dishonour.
Reference:
Ext.P3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of sending the statutory notice.
Reference:
Ext.P4
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of receipt of the statutory notice by the accused.
Reference:
Ext.P5
Document Type: Account Opening Form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document establishing the account from which the cheque was drawn.
Reference:
Ext.P6
Document Type: Cheque Issue Register
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing the issuance of the cheque.
Reference:
Ext.P7
Document Type: Certification
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certification related to the cheque transaction.
Reference:
Ext.P7(a)
Document Type: Digital Record
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Digital record documenting the dishonour of the cheque.
Reference:
Ext.P8

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
S.T.
Case Code Year
2020

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Imprisonment Involved
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act
Imprisonment Duration
1 month

Quick Facts

Location
KOTTAYAM
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Mon, 10/26/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 12/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co. (P) Ltd. vs Mr. John V.V. regarding offence under Section 138 of N.I Act
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – IV
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between M/s. M.M Publications Ltd. vs P S Mohammed Basheer regarding offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act
IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-V
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Sanju Raju vs Rajesh P.R. regarding dishonor of cheque
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – IV
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Sanju Raju vs Rajesh P.R. regarding offence punishable U/s. 138 of N.I Act
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – IV
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Shriram Transport Finance Co.Ltd vs Abey regarding dishonor of cheque
COURT OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE – IV
Criminal Case Defendant Won