Case Summary
The plaintiffs, G. Saseendran and J. Omana, filed a suit for injunction and fixation of boundary against the defendant Thangal Kunju. The case was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as not pressed due to the absence of the plaintiffs and the lack of a press memo.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- G. Saseendran
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- J. Omana
- Party Age
- 80
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thangal Kunju
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- John George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jasmin M
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nil
- Appearance Type
- Case between G. Saseendran et al vs Thangal Kunju regarding injunction and fixation of boundary. > Case advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
This suit is filed by the plaintiff for injunction and fixation of boundary u/s 26 u/O VI & VII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between G. Saseendran et al vs Thangal Kunju regarding injunction and fixation of boundary.
Case Code Year
Case between G. Saseendran et al vs Thangal Kunju regarding injunction and fixation of boundary.