Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 1706/2005

Case between Fr.Sleeba Paul Vattavelil vs The Branch Manager, ING Vysya bank Ltd et al regarding dismissal of suit for default.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-09-16
Duration
approximately-20 years

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Fr.Sleeba Paul Vattavelil filed a suit against ING Vysya bank Ltd and its officials. The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and inability to adduce evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found the plaintiff's request for adjournment due to being abroad as insufficient. Consequently, the suit was dismissed for default.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not provide evidence despite multiple adjournments.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, I.A 2/25 is dismissed and Suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Fr.Sleeba Paul Vattavelil (43 years years) Vattavelil house, Kolenchery P.O, Ernakulam District, Kerala State

Defendants

The Branch Manager, ING Vysya bank Ltd (Age not specified years) M.G.Road, Ernakulam Jancy Davis (Age not specified years) M.G.Road, Ernakulam M/s ING Vysya Bank Ltd (Age not specified years) ING Vysya House, 2nd floor, (right wing), 22, M.G.Road, Banglore – 560 001 The Registrar, Karvy Computer Shares Pvt Ltd. (Age not specified years) Karvy house, 46, Avenue 4, Street no. 1, Banjara Hills,Hyderbad, Andhra Pradesh State

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Request for adjournment of the suit due to the plaintiff's unavailability.
Evidence:
However, this cannot be considered as a genuine ground to postpone the trial.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Dismissal of the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to adduce evidence.
Evidence:
Hence, I.A 2/25 is dismissed and Suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District, Kerala State
Case Filed
Sat, 01/01/2005 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases