Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 401/2023

Case between Francis K.R et al vs Benedict et al regarding dismissal as not pressed.

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-08-17
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, including Francis K.R and Mary Josepheena K.R, filed a suit against the defendants Benedict and Treesa. The case was dismissed as not pressed during the hearing on August 17, 2024.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as not pressed due to the plaintiffs not pursuing the case.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

the court on the same day delivered the following: JUDGMENT Plaintiff represented. Not press memo filed. Dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Francis K.R (63 years) Kurisuparambil House, Santhi Nagar, Vennala P.O, Edappally South Village, Ernakulam District. Mary Josepheena K.R (58 years) Asariparambil, Mariyalayam Road, Near St. Antony’s Church, Panangad – 682 506, Kumbalam Village. Brijitt @ Jijo Jolly (56 years) Pooppana House, Ulakambara Road, Vennala P.O, Ernakulam District. Rossy (53 years) Kanakkappilly House, Ezhupunna North, Ezhupunna P.O, Alappuzha District.

Defendants

Benedict (61 years) Kurisuparambil House, Ponnurunni, Vyttila P.O, Pin- 682 019, Poonithura Village. Treesa (61 years) Kurisuparambil House, Ponnurunni, Vyttila P.O. Tobin K.J (34 years) Kurisuparambil House, represented by Guardian, 1st Defendant Benedict.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases