Case Summary
The plaintiffs, including Francis K.R and Mary Josepheena K.R, filed a suit against the defendants Benedict and Treesa. The case was dismissed as not pressed during the hearing on August 17, 2024.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as not pressed due to the plaintiffs not pursuing the case.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
the court on the same day delivered the following: JUDGMENT Plaintiff represented. Not press memo filed. Dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Francis K.R
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mary Josepheena K.R
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Brijitt @ Jijo Jolly
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rossy
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Benedict
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Treesa
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Tobin K.J
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Mohammed Faisal Naha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K. Manuraj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Francis K.R et al vs Benedict et al regarding dismissal as not pressed.
Case Code Year
Case between Francis K.R et al vs Benedict et al regarding dismissal as not pressed.