Case Summary
Firoz Khan and Haseena Firozkhan are the plaintiffs, while Muhammed.M.S is the defendant. The case was about the non-remittance of balance court fee, leading to the rejection of the plaintiffs' suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff's suit was rejected due to the non-remittance of the balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was rejected due to non-remittance of court fees, which is a fundamental requirement for a suit to proceed.
The suit was rejected due to non-remittance of court fees, which is a fundamental requirement for a suit to proceed.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was rejected due to non-remittance of court fees, which is a fundamental requirement for a suit to proceed.
The suit was rejected due to non-remittance of court fees, which is a fundamental requirement for a suit to proceed.
Supporting Evidence
The court stated the necessity of remitting balance court fees for proceeding with the case.
Judgment Evidence:
Balance Court Fee not seen remitted. Plaint is rejected for non remittance of Balance Court Fee.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Firoz Khan
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Haseena Firozkhan
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammed.M.S
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
NIL
Defendants Documents
NIL
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.P.Renadive
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.D.Padmini Rose
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Indukala.R.P
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Sruthy Sudheer
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Divya.R.Nair
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Anakha.K.Vijay
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.P.S.Harikumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Rahul.H.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaint was rejected for non remittance of Balance Court Fee.
Evidence:
Plaint is rejected for non remittance of Balance Court Fee.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022