Case Summary
The Federal Bank Ltd filed a suit against Anoop S.V and Veena Suresh for the realization of money. The case was brought under the Code of Civil Procedure.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's absence and a failure to remit the balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Plaintiff absent represented. Defendant absent represented. Balance court fee not remitted. Sought time for balance court fee, no application filed. Plaint rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- The Federal Bank Ltd
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anoop S.V
- Party Age
- 27
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Veena Suresh
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv.K.G.Baiju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv. Poornima.G
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Adv. Pattathanam R Rajeev
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaintiff sought time for balance court fee.
Evidence:
Balance court fee not remitted. Sought time for balance court fee, no application filed. Plaint rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between The Federal Bank Ltd vs Anoop S.V et al regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between The Federal Bank Ltd vs Anoop S.V et al regarding realisation of money