Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
S.T. No. 33/2024

Case between Febin K.P. vs Prashanth P. regarding dishonor of cheques.

Court
COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-II, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan B.
Order Date
2025-02-11
Duration
approximately-2 years 10 months
Case Closed
Tue, 02/11/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Febin K.P. is the complainant who alleges that Prashanth P. owes him a debt of Rs. 5,00,000/-. Prashanth issued cheques which were dishonored, leading to this complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The accused, Prashanth P., was found guilty of issuing dishonored cheques and was sentenced to imprisonment with a fine.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The accused is sentenced to undergo Simple Imprisonment till rising of the court and pay a fine of ₹10,00,000/-.
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The accused, Prashanth P., was found guilty of issuing dishonored cheques and was sentenced to imprisonment with a fine.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The cheques were issued for a legally enforceable debt and were dishonored for insufficient funds.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The cheques were issued for a legally enforceable debt and were dishonored for insufficient funds.
Supporting Evidence
Hence, it is proved that Ext.P1 and P6 cheques are issued for a discharge of a legally enforceable debt or liability.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the accused is sentenced to undergo Simple Imprisonment till rising of the court and to pay a fine of ₹10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs Only) U/s. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Febin K.P.
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prashanth P.
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Cheque No. 014509, Return Memo, Registered lawyer notice, Postal Receipt, Acknowledgment Card
Defendants Documents
Ledger Accounts, Bank Account Receipts

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M. Siju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.M. Reghu Nath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The accused is ordered to pay a fine as damages for the offence under section 138 of the N.I. Act.
Evidence:
The accused is sentenced to undergo Simple Imprisonment till rising of the court and to pay a fine of ₹10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs Only) U/s. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This cheque was issued by the accused in favor of the complainant for discharge of legally owed debt.
Reference:
Ext.P1
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This cheque was issued by the accused in favor of the complainant for discharge of legally owed debt.
Reference:
Ext.P6
Document Type: Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This memo indicates that the cheque was returned unpaid, supporting the complainant's claim.
Reference:
Ext.P2
Document Type: Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This memo indicates that the cheque was returned unpaid, supporting the complainant's claim.
Reference:
Ext.P7
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This legal notice was sent to the accused after dishonor of the cheque, formalizing the claim.
Reference:
Ext.P3
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This legal notice was sent to the accused after dishonor of the cheque, formalizing the claim.
Reference:
Ext.P8
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This receipt confirms that the legal notice was sent to the accused.
Reference:
Ext.P4
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This receipt confirms that the legal notice was sent to the accused.
Reference:
Ext.P9
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This card confirms that the accused received the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.P5
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This card confirms that the accused received the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.P10
Document Type: Ledger Accounts
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
These accounts were submitted by the defendant to support his claims of payment.
Reference:
Ext.D1
Document Type: Bank Account Receipts
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
These receipts were submitted by the defendant to support his claims of payment.
Reference:
Ext.D2

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between Febin K.P. vs Prashanth P. regarding dishonor of cheques.
Case Code Year
Case between Febin K.P. vs Prashanth P. regarding dishonor of cheques.

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Imprisonment Involved
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act
Imprisonment Duration
6 months

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 03/23/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 02/11/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Faisal vs Rahees regarding dishonor of cheque under the Negotiable Instruments Act
Court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class-II, Nadapuram
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Moosa S/o Aboobacker Haji vs Sajeevan S/o Kumaran regarding dishonor of cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-II, NADAPURAM
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between P. Muhammadali vs Ameer Kattaroli regarding U/s.138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
Court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class-II, Nadapuram
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Nikhil vs Shamsu regarding dishonor of cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-II, NADAPURAM
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between M. K. Abdul Rahman vs Hameed P. K. regarding U/s.138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class-II, Nadapuram
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won