Case Summary
Fazeela. R is the plaintiff and Canara Bank is the defendant in this case. The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed because the plaintiff was absent and did not have representation in court.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was not present nor represented in court.
The plaintiff was not present nor represented in court.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was not present nor represented in court.
The plaintiff was not present nor represented in court.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was not present nor represented in court.
Judgment Evidence:
Since the plaintiff is neither present nor represented. The suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Fazeela. R
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Canara Bank
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Rakhi Ravikumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K. Prasanth
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
The suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022